Partners × districts × themes, with TRI presence, Common Ground blocks and CSR flow. A sense-making view for partnership & ecosystem decisions.
A landscape map of the development-partner ecosystem in Jharkhand — who works where, on what, and where the gaps are — to inform where to add partners, steer funding, and strengthen thin themes.
How to read it. The map switches between lenses (place health, partner density, theme breadth, CSR, DMF, coverage gap, block presence…); click any district for its full profile. Below sit the Ecosystem & Place Health scores, the partner × theme matrix, funders and government spend. ✳ indicative layers (external orgs, funders, DMF) are compiled from public sources and kept out of the health scores unless you toggle them in; the source spreadsheets are the spine. Fully offline & self-contained.
Sources: Partners Geography & Thematic focus · TRI Geographic Presence (Jul 2026) · Common Ground block list · Jharkhand CSR (MCA) · boundaries © udit-001/india-maps-data (2011 census). District names & themes normalised; out-of-state / town names kept off the map. See the full Sources section at the bottom.
A funder-facing read on the state of the partner ecosystem — coverage, reach into priority districts, resilience, thematic balance, network depth and how well resources track effort.
Where thematic energy concentrates. ● teal = source-file partner · ● gold = ✳ indicative org (theme keyword-mapped from its focus). Footer = orgs per theme (source + indicative, with source-only in grey).
Who funds whom in Jharkhand. The “Supports in Jharkhand” column links each funder to the implementing org(s) it backs here (gold tags match the Partner directory); where a funder's local grantees aren't public, that's stated plainly. Compiled from public sources, kept out of the health scores.
The largest place-based public money in Jharkhand. DMF (District Mineral Foundation) is district-specific and concentrated in the coal/iron belt — see the “DMF mining fund ✳” map lens. State & central schemes are largely statewide. Figures from public sources (CSE, state budget, press); DMF district split is cumulative to Mar-2018 and total has since grown well beyond ₹12,000 Cr.
All implementing organisations — your source-file partners plus ✳ indicative orgs compiled from public sources (PRADAN, CInI, CEED, Tata Steel Foundation…). Click a column header to sort; click a district tag to focus the map.
Each district scored 0–100 on how well it is served (partner presence 45% · thematic breadth 30% · resilience/no single-point-of-failure 25%), ranked neediest-first. Priority = aspirational & weakly served.
The full grid: partners, themes, aspirational status (per TRI), TRI presence and latest-year CSR.
Everything above is traceable. Source spreadsheets are the spine; ✳ indicative orgs, funders and government figures are compiled from the public links below and kept out of the health scores.